There are a number of expressions that come to mind. Reconstructionist, that is seeking to properly understand and grasp within its original cultural context, our ancestral practice. Rebuilding our altars, once only a metaphor, and now actual construction. We seek to return to something that was taken from our ancestors years ago, and […]
History does NOT support their position, but they want it to:
The recent attack (I was away on vacation):
Our ancestors were sailors and traders and “whiteness” is a much more modern concept.
Killing of ROTC Second Lieutenant:
So, if you wonder why I want these people treated as terrorists, now you know. An excerpt from the Oath taken by military officers:
“…do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same…”
Unrelated Item for Richard Spenser. I do NOT consider them equivalent.
Recent Richard Spencer news:
When you have lost everything, even your name, there is little point in going on. I was not churlish enough to leave my body hanging where I would be found by those who would be hurt by it. I brought my rope with me to the park. There was an old maple tree […]
I honor all the gods, although Odin is one I do not do much more than that. Still, the story resonates and might be of interest to those who do.
I think this is certainly informative and that, as Heathens, we have to dive in and be aware of these cesspools.
We understand, sadly, these people better than most. I wish that it were not so.
This is inspired first and foremost by this:
The majority of the article deals with classified information and intelligence gathering which, while important, is not what I wish to address:
Read from – The corruption has begun.
This is the issue I have feared for a long time, that honorable folks will be corroded by someone without honor or loyalty. That individual’s record is public and I feel no need to address that here.
Our Constitution bans Guilt by Association:
Guilty by association refers to the attribution of guilt without any proof on individuals solely for the reason that those whom they associate with are guilty.
It is good that this is banned by law and it is also seen as a logical fallacy: